Why You Are Completely Wrong About Forward Guidance Being More Important Than Results
- Posted by Leigh Drogen
- on December 12th, 2013
I want to take a minute to address a pervasive but completely statistically unfounded belief that a wide swath of market participants seem to share. Like many beliefs of market participants, there is zero evidence to back this one up, it has been formed solely based on the availability heuristic.
When people hear that a company has lowered or raised guidance they assume that the movement in the stock is in some way correlated to that announcement, mostly because market participants are always looking for something to tie every little movement to so that they can sleep at night with the belief that they understand why they took that position home at night.
During my days at Geller Capital and Surfview Capital, and more recently at Estimize, I have read a good portion of the literature around the nature of pre and post earnings drift associated with different factors. Nowhere, ever, did I read any paper that statistically measured the association between guidance announcements and post earnings drift.
Nowhere. Ever. None.
Now don’t get me wrong, guidance changes can have a huge effect on stocks, and they can have a huge effect on the opening gap. I’m not dismissing the fact that guidance can impact how a stock trades. What I’m saying is that from a quantitative, systematic perspective, there is no correlation between changes in guidance in either direction and predictable post earnings drift on any timeframe.
On the other hand, there is bountiful proof that there exists a significant post earnings drift associated with a company beating or missing its expected earnings. Meaning…the market is, whether you agree with it or not, paying more attention in aggregate to beating or missing earnings than those guidance changes once the bell rings the next day. This quantitative research goes back several decades, and more recently Rice University published a paper showing results that prove the Estimize Consensus is the better benchmark for post earnings drift than the Wall Street consensus as reported by Thomson Reuters IBES.
You can find that paper HERE.
So please, stop with the whole guidance is more important thing. It’s not.
Full Disclosure: Nothing on this site should ever be considered to be advice, research or an invitation to buy or sell any securities, please see the Disclaimer page for a full disclaimer.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Leigh Drogen is the founder and chief investment officer of Surfview Capital, LLC, a New York based investment management firm employing an intermediate term long/short momentum strategy. More »
- The Most Powerful 27 Year Old In Finance?
- You Won’t Believe What This Asshole Said About Yo
- Deltix Publishes Quant Strategy Using Estimize Data Producing 28.5% Cumulative Market Neutral Returns
- Here’s Why Airbnb and Uber Should Completely Ignore Government Regulations
- Beware The False Promises Of Quant Nirvana Behind New Financial Products Like Kensho
- My 10 Stocks and Big Trends for 2014
- Please Just Stop Building These Apps
- Finance People Don’t Have Pseudonyms, and Other Musings On Identity In Social Finance
- Estimize Named 1 of Forbes 9 Hottest Startups of 2013
- Here’s How We Posted a 77.4% Gain With 2013 Picks and Trends
- July 2014
- June 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011