Position Sizing is Everything
- Posted by Leigh Drogen
- on January 18th, 2010
Trading, like most things in life, is part science and part art form. You must be willing to accept that there are certain strategies which work, and those which do not. You must also learn the art of trading, develop the intuition required to read the market, and the experience on which to anchor your confidence.
The most crucial systemic or scientific aspect of my trading lies in the way I use position sizing. It is the fundamental basis for success in my trading, without the discipline to stick my the system, I would be lost in the market. Every good trader has their own view on position sizing to fit their style of trading, the key is that they have one. If you do not have a system that you follow rigorously, I implore you to find one, now. Nothing, and I mean nothing, will improve your trading results more than having a position sizing and stop loss system, period.
I use a position sizing algorithm based on the average true range (ATR). For the lay person, the average true range is just another word for volatility, it represents the average price swing from high to low that an asset experiences on an average day. I use a 20 period moving average to calculate the ATR, some people use 14.
Why do I use the ATR? Well, for one it gives us a good way to measure how much a position is likely to move in percentage terms on an average day. Trading with technical analysis is all about the pattern, many times we can guestimate the expected move an asset will make based on the pattern we see in the chart. We are not trying to capture pure price movement, we are trying to capture a pattern. It makes no difference whether we expect the asset to move in our favor by 3% or 30%, what matters is the pattern. By using volatility weighted positions, I am making sure not to be exposing myself to any one trade to a major extent above the others.
Here’s how it works:
Let’s say that my account value is $100,000, the ATR of the asset I’m trading is $3, and the asset trades at $100. Now, here is where you must decide how much risk you are willing to take on each trade, how much of your capital you are willing to lose by being wrong. Let’s say that you are willing to lose 2% of your capital on each trade, equivalent to $2,000 in this case. You also must chose how many ATR units you are willing to let the asset go against you before you are wrong and stop out of the trade. I have read a good deal of literature on this subject, and good experience using a 2 ATR stop. Using our risk parameters, we are willing to allow the asset to fall by 6%, or in this case equal to 6% before we stop out, on a long side trade. We come to this by multiplying the 20 period ATR of the asset by our risk parameter of a 2 ATR stop. We now have the absolute value of our stop, which is $6. We divide our 2% risk capital ($2,000) by $6 and we come out with the number of units to buy, or shares in the case of an equity. In this example it would be 333 shares.
Put more elegantly position size in units = ((porfolio size * % of capital to risk)/(ATR*2)) note – % of capital to risk is represented as a decimal (.02) in this case
Now, in my case, I will add units of risk at times as the position moves in my direction. I will take another lot 1/2 ATR in my direction. That second lot gets the same risk management treatment as the first, think of it as it’s own separate trade. Some systems, like mine, allow up to 4 units of risk in one trade, in this case you would be putting 8% of your capital at risk. It takes a lot of balls to put that much on the line.
I don’t use 2% of portfolio value as my risk tolerance level, I am far more conservative because of the fact that I often add several units of risk to a trade. I use .5% of the portfolio, maxing out at 2% per trade with the max 4 units of risk. How much you are willing to risk should be dependent on two things, for one your ability to handle big losses and stay discipline with your strategy in the face of defeat. And two, how often you trade. Everyone finds their own happy medium, find yours and stick to it!
Full Disclosure: Nothing on this site should ever be considered to be advice, research or an invitation to buy or sell any securities, please see the Disclaimer page for a full disclaimer.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Leigh Drogen is the founder and chief investment officer of Surfview Capital, LLC, a New York based investment management firm employing an intermediate term long/short momentum strategy. More »
- Estimize Raises Series B Led By WorldQuant Ventures
- Will Automation Make Africa The Lost Continent
- My 2015 Stock Picks and Big Trends
- Is Israel In Danger of Being Destroyed?
- Review Of My 2014 Picks and Trends
- The Most Powerful 27 Year Old In Finance?
- You Won’t Believe What This Asshole Said About Yo
- Deltix Publishes Quant Strategy Using Estimize Data Producing 28.5% Cumulative Market Neutral Returns
- Here’s Why Airbnb and Uber Should Completely Ignore Government Regulations
- Beware The False Promises Of Quant Nirvana Behind New Financial Products Like Kensho
- April 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011